Just to clarify:

The following PRs are already merged to 1.11.0:

   - https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14297 - Spark: Support writing
   shredded variant in Iceberg-Spark
   - https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15512 - Spark: fix delete from
   branch for canDeleteWhere where it does not resolve to the correct branch -
   WAP fix
   - https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15475 - Flink: Add Nanosecond
   Precision Support for Flink-Iceberg Integration


The missing ones are the ones backporting those to other engine versions:

   - For: 14297 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14297>:
      - 16241 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16241> - Backport for
      variant shredding in Spark 4.0
   - For: 15512 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15512>:
      - 16245 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16245> - Spark:
      backport PR #15512 to v3.4, v3.5, v4.0 for WAP branch delete fix
   - For: 15475 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15475>:
      - #16183 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16183>,  #16239
      <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16239>, #16240
      <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16240> - Backport for Nano
      timestamps for Flink 2.0/1.20


So the PRs needed on 1.11.0 are:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16241
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16245
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16183
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16239
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16240
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16186

Aihua Xu <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. máj. 8., P, 17:13):

> Thank you all for the feedback and for verifying the release candidate.
> Based on the issues identified above, we will include the following fixes
> and cut RC2 with a new vote:
>
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14297
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15512
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15475
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16186
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions or identified additional
> issues.
>
> Thanks,
> Aihua
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 10:09 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I also looked into this. There is a configuration
>> gcs.analytics-core.enabled to enable/disable GCS Analytics Core. The
>> current implementation always requires runtime dependency of GCS Analytics
>> Core even if the configuration is off. Ideally we can lazy load such
>> dependency so the dependency is only required when the feature is
>> explicitly enabled. But since GCP is likely to enable GCS Analytics Core by
>> default, I feel it's reasonable for downstream projects using non-bundle
>> jars to add this dependency.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 6:54 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Looked a little more.
>>>
>>> So Iceberg's cloud modules consistently use compileOnly for vendor SDKs
>>> and rely on either the bundle artifact or downstream coordination for
>>> runtime. So, both changes are expected for downstream consumers using the
>>> non-bundle jars. Maybe we don't need to change anything.
>>>
>>> iceberg-gcp module
>>>
>>> compileOnly platform(libs.google.libraries.bom)
>>> compileOnly "com.google.cloud:google-cloud-storage"
>>> compileOnly "com.google.cloud:google-cloud-kms"
>>> compileOnly(libs.gcs.analytics.core)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 6:16 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yuya, thanks for reporting the discovery.
>>>>
>>>> Azure: I approved your PR and can merge it soon:
>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16186
>>>> GCP: the new dependency is marked as compileOnly in PR 14333
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14333>, as it is an opt-in
>>>> feature. we need to either change the dep to implementation or update the
>>>> code similar to the Azure fix above.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 4:07 PM Yuya Ebihara <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Aihua,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for leading the release!
>>>>>
>>>>> Just a quick reminder about two dependency-related items from a
>>>>> downstream perspective:
>>>>> * Azure module users will require azure-security-keyvault-keys, even
>>>>> when table encryption is not used, as noted in
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16186
>>>>> * GCS module users will require gcs-analytics-core
>>>>>
>>>>> I ran into CI failures with 1.11.0 in Trino because the project does
>>>>> not use the azure-bundle or gcp-bundle modules.
>>>>> The CI passed once we explicitly added these two dependencies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Yuya Ebihara
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 8, 2026 at 4:58 AM Péter Váry <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> First of all, thanks to everyone for the effort put into preparing
>>>>>> this release!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to highlight that RC1 is built from a branch where the
>>>>>> following features have not been backported to all engine versions:
>>>>>> - Spark: Support writing shredded variant in Iceberg-Spark (
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14297) - Available in Spark
>>>>>> 4.1, but not in Spark 4.0
>>>>>> - Spark: fix delete from branch for canDeleteWhere where it does not
>>>>>> resolve to the correct branch (
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15512) - Available in Spark
>>>>>> 4.1, but not in Spark 4.0, 3.5, or 3.4
>>>>>> - Flink: Add Nanosecond Precision Support for Flink-Iceberg
>>>>>> Integration (https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15475) -
>>>>>> Available in Flink 2.1, but not in Flink 2.0 or 1.20
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is up to the community to decide whether these missing backports
>>>>>> should be considered release blockers. Most of the corresponding PRs have
>>>>>> already been merged to main (except #15512), and including them in the
>>>>>> release should be relatively straightforward.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From my perspective, I would prefer not to release with these gaps.
>>>>>> That said, I understand the urgency and the need for a release, and I am
>>>>>> happy to go with the community’s decision.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aihua Xu <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. máj. 7., Cs,
>>>>>> 18:26):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>>>>>>> Iceberg 1.11.0 release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The commit ID is 0f657edf12dc29f8487a679bfdd4210e9588d014
>>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.11.0-rc1
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.11.0-rc1
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/0f657edf12dc29f8487a679bfdd4210e9588d014
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.11.0-rc1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here:
>>>>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>>>>>>> repository URL is:
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1278/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here:
>>>>>>> * https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.11.0
>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are
>>>>>>> encouraged to cast
>>>>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1
>>>>>>> votes and more binding
>>>>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

Reply via email to