+1 (binding) On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 9:53 AM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Wed, May 13, 2026, 9:08 PM Ajantha Bhat <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> - Ajantha >> >> On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 10:32 PM Steve <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 8:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 (non binding) >>> > >>> > Regards >>> > JB >>> > >>> > On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 10:00 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi everyone, >>> >> >>> >> I propose adding the CatalogObjectIdentifier schema to the REST >>> catalog OpenAPI spec. >>> >> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16144 >>> >> >>> >> Summary: >>> >> >>> >> CatalogObjectIdentifier is an ordered list of hierarchical levels (a >>> JSON array of strings) that identifies any catalog object, such as a table, >>> view, materialized view, namespace, or function. >>> >> Structurally the same as Namespace; the distinct name signals "any >>> catalog object" rather than specifically a namespace path. >>> >> The kind of object an identifier refers to is determined by context >>> (the endpoint, or a companion type discriminator defined by that endpoint), >>> not by the identifier structure itself. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Motivation: multiple concurrent efforts need a generic catalog-object >>> identifier and would otherwise each introduce their own >>> >> >>> >> events endpoint (#12584), >>> >> resolve endpoint (#15830), >>> >> functions endpoint (#15180). >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Adding one shared schema avoids identifier proliferation as new >>> object types are added to the spec. >>> >> >>> >> Please review the PR and vote in the next 72 hours. >>> >> >>> >> [ ] +1 Add CatalogObjectIdentifier to the REST OpenAPI spec >>> >> [ ] +0 >>> >> [ ] -1 Do not add CatalogObjectIdentifier because... >>> >> >>> >> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are >>> encouraged to cast non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 >>> binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Steven >>> >> >>> >> Dev thread: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/w6r3cvj483n4fsb5js84smwg8331stbs >>> >> Design doc: >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NTQhgNbP2dkIMuXUMA5JdwliVQKCp1TU_ux5J_AaPiw/edit?tab=t.0 >>> >> Java impl: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16160 >>> >>
