+1 (non-binding) Verified locally:
- SHA-512: matches - GPG signature: Good signature from Steven Wu (CODE SIGNING KEY) < [email protected]> - Tag apache-iceberg-1.11.0-rc4 = 6976e020b894f6a6777704df2b8c4458cb291ae9 - LICENSE / NOTICE / README.md present - dev/check-license: RAT checks passed - No binary artifacts (.jar/.war/.nar/.class/.so/.dylib/.dll/.exe) in source tarball - ./gradlew build -x integrationTest -x test: Build Successful Thanks Aihua for the release and all of the community for the contributions! On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 10:15 PM Yuya Ebihara < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) from Trino perspective. > > Confirmed that Trino CI is green. > It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC > (PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and > Snowflake. > > Thanks again for running the release! > > Yuya > > On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 1:54 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Some minor improvements to note (see below). >> >> I checked: >> - source distribution >> -- signature and checksum are correct >> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good (nit: Presto and Delta Lake has NOTICE >> files that could be included in the Iceberg NOTICE) >> -- ASF header is present in all expected files >> -- No binary file found in the source distribution >> - AWS Bundle >> -- signature and checksum are correct >> -- nit: jar contains LICENSE/NOTICE in the root, but also >> META-INF/LICENSE and META-INF/NOTICE. Usually, we should have only >> META-INF/LICENSE and META-INF/NOTICE. Also, it seems LICENSE and NOTICE are >> packaged twice in the jar. >> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct (nit: aws-crt-java, >> aws-eventstream-java have different NOTICE then the "regular" AWS Java SDK). >> - Azure Bundle >> -- signature and checksum are correct >> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good (nit: NOTICE could include NOTICE content >> from reactor-core and reactor-netty). As for AWS bundle, filtering >> META-INF/LICENSE and META-INF/NOTICE in the shade plugin would be good. >> - GCP Bundle >> -- signature and checksum are correct >> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good (as for AWS and Azure bundle, filtering on >> the shade plugin would be welcome). >> - Flink Runtime >> -- signature and checksum are correct >> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good. Nit: LICENSE and NOTICE are packaged >> twice in the jar file. META-INF/LICENSE* and META-INF/NOTICE* should be >> cleanup in favor of the Iceberg LICENSE/NOTICE. >> - Spark Runtime >> -- signature and checksum are correct >> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 7:32 AM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Everyone, >>> >>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>> Iceberg 1.11.0 release. >>> >>> The commit ID is 6976e020b894f6a6777704df2b8c4458cb291ae9 >>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.11.0-rc4 >>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.11.0-rc4 >>> * >>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/6976e020b894f6a6777704df2b8c4458cb291ae9 >>> >>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>> * >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.11.0-rc4 >>> >>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>> >>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository >>> URL is: >>> * >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1282/ >>> >>> Please download, verify, and test. >>> >>> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here: >>> * https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release >>> >>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.11.0 >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>> >>> >>> >>>
