My only suggestion was to cut another RC with the Variant non shredding
support since https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/pull/932 is close to
being merged.
If it can go later in a future release, this RC is good to go as well.
Below is my vote:

+1 (non-binding)

Verified locally on macOS:

   - SHA-512: matches
   - GPG signature: Good signature from Matt Topol <[email protected]>
   - Tag v0.6.0-rc0 = 53fa29ccc29817c2238405c50716e8058419ac61
   - LICENSE / NOTICE / README.md present
   - RAT (dev/check-license): RAT checks passed
   - No binary artifacts (.jar/.so/.dylib/.dll/.exe/.a) in source tarball
   -  go build ./... and go test ./... : both succeeded



On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 2:47 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev <
[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> пн, 18 мая 2026 г., 23:00 Matt Topol <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of
>> Apache Iceberg Go version v0.6.0.
>>
>> This release candidate is based on commit:
>> 53fa29ccc29817c2238405c50716e8058419ac61 [1]
>>
>> The source release rc0 is hosted at [2].
>>
>> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests,
>> and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate.
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg Go v0.6.0
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Iceberg Go v0.6.0 because...
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/tree/53fa29ccc29817c2238405c50716e8058419ac61
>> [2]:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-go-0.6.0-rc0
>> [3]:
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
>>
>

Reply via email to