+1 (binding) On Mon, Jun 1, 2026 at 11:21 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Bumping this thread. The FunctionIdentifier vs CatalogObjectIdentifier > discussion has been resolved — #16144 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16144> merged > CatalogObjectIdentifier, and PR #15180 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15180> now uses it. > > Restarting the vote: > > [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns > > Thanks, > > Huaxin > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 11:13 AM vaquar khan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Regards, >> Vaquar Khan >> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2026, 1:03 PM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 7:22 PM Ajantha Bhat <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 (non binding) >>> > >>> > with minor comments on the PR. >>> > >>> > - Ajantha >>> > >>> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2026 at 12:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> +1 (non binding) >>> >> >>> >> Regards >>> >> JB >>> >> >>> >> Le jeu. 26 mars 2026 à 01:44, huaxin gao <[email protected]> a >>> écrit : >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> >>> >>> I propose adding REST catalog endpoints for listing and loading >>> functions, following the Iceberg UDF spec. >>> >>> >>> >>> New endpoints: >>> >>> >>> >>> GET /v1/{prefix}/namespaces/{namespace}/functions — list functions >>> in a namespace >>> >>> GET /v1/{prefix}/namespaces/{namespace}/functions/{function} — load >>> a function >>> >>> >>> >>> ListFunctionsResponse returns FunctionIdentifier objects (namespace >>> + name), consistent with listTables. LoadFunctionResult returns inline UDF >>> metadata and optional metadata-location, following the >>> LoadTableResult/LoadViewResult pattern. Read-only; CRUD endpoints will >>> follow in a separate proposal. >>> >>> >>> >>> For details please check: >>> >>> >>> >>> Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15180 >>> >>> >>> >>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>> >>> >>> >>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>> >>> [ ] +0 >>> >>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>> >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Huaxin >>> >>
