+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 3:13 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding), thanks Szehon! > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 9:24 PM Manish Malhotra < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks Szehon! >> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 7:10 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Thanks, Szehon! >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 6:12 PM Yuya Ebihara < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> Yuya >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 10:07 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 4:37 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1(binding) >>>>>> Yufei >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 4:17 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi everyone, I'd like to start a vote to add the "specific-name" >>>>>>> field to identify a specific overload of a UDF, to support the >>>>>>> corresponding concept from the SQL spec. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16727. Thank you to >>>>>>> everyone who reviewed the spec so far! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: [ ] +1 Add these changes to the >>>>>>> spec [ ] +0 [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns Thanks, Szehon >>>>>>> >>>>>>
