Yeah, after some more thought, I think you're right about that. I was making an exception for Polaris, since that community showed interest in Terraform resources.
If nobody has any objections, I'll send out a PR to remove the Polaris resources and then start a thread in the Polaris dev list about creating a provider there. On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 12:24 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Alex, > > I'm a little confused, why is the Polaris terraform included with > Iceberg? I'm not a terraform expert, but I would expect that the Polaris > project would be providing modules for configuring resources related to > Polaris. > > Once we add support for a specific project, it sets a precedent that we > have to add support for other projects as well and it's a little difficult > to draw a line as to where that support should end. > > Would this be better owned by Polaris? > > -Dan > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 11:11 AM Alex Stephen via dev < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Realized I didn't put a DISCUSS tag on this when I sent it originally. >> >> Progress is moving along with the Iceberg Terraform Provider >> <https://github.com/apache/terraform-provider-iceberg>! We've added >> support for managing Namespaces and Tables. Additionally, the Polaris >> community contributed support for Polaris Principals. >> >> Unless anybody has any concerns, we're going to aim for a release next >> week. >> >> Excited to hear back, >> >> -- Alex Stephen >> >
