>From GitHub's billing docs, Copilot code review consumes both AI credits and GitHub Actions minutes (which are free for public repos.)
The AI credit quota depends on ASF's GitHub/Copilot billing setup, which does not seem to be publicly documented. On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 11:22 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > Good to see this is now enabled by ASF! I wanted to give this a try before > but it wasn't available yet in the Apache org. I think it's very helpful as > a first review for PRs. > > One thing though: > > before enabling such features, projects should discuss the > workflow/resource impact with the project team > > What's our quota for Copilot Reviews? Will it eat into our CI resources? > What happens if we use it up? > Would be good to know these before enabling it. I could find anything from > the ASF docs above > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 7:52 PM vaquar khan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> Good one 👍 >> >> Regards, >> Viquar Khan >> >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2026, 8:33 PM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1, this can help catch bugs or inconsistencies early in the PR process. >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 11:20 PM Jones, Danny <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 on trialling something like GH Copilot for review. I was thinking >>>> about proposing this for iceberg-rust – for the same reasons others raised >>>> on reviewer bandwidth. I look forward to hearing how it goes for >>>> iceberg-cpp, and wonder if anyone on the Arrow project can share how it’s >>>> been for them so far. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> One thing raised by Andrew Lamb on one of the Arrow tuning PRs[1] is to >>>> define how contributors should respond to the feedback from Copilot. I >>>> think this would be useful for us too – in particular, I’d encourage >>>> contributors and reviewers alike to be vocal on the comments in PRs such >>>> that this can be fed back in for tuning the custom guidance – positive and >>>> negative! Treat it a bit like providing feedback for a retrospective. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Danny >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/50117 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From: *Renjie Liu <[email protected]> >>>> *Reply to: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> *Date: *Thursday, 16 July 2026 at 07:04 >>>> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> *Subject: *RE: [EXTERNAL] [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub Copilot code review >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do >>>> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and >>>> know the content is safe. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 for this. Reviewer bandwidth is limited and if it works well for >>>> iceberg-cpp, I'm looking forward to introduce it to other repos. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 1:18 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I would like to discuss enabling ASF-managed GitHub Copilot code review >>>> for >>>> Iceberg repositories, starting with iceberg-cpp as a small trial: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-cpp/pull/833 >>>> >>>> This would enable automatic Copilot review on non-draft PRs, using the >>>> ASF >>>> `.asf.yaml` `github.copilot_code_review` setting. >>>> >>>> Apache Arrow recently enabled and tuned this feature: >>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/50117 >>>> >>>> ASF Infra documents this as a supported `.asf.yaml` feature: >>>> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml#copilot-code-review >>>> >>>> The `.asf.yaml` docs also say that before enabling such features, >>>> projects >>>> should discuss the workflow/resource impact with the project team: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml#before-you-start-using-asfyaml >>>> >>>> I suggest starting with iceberg-cpp first as a trial, because reviewer >>>> bandwidth >>>> is limited there and Copilot may provide useful first-pass feedback. If >>>> it works >>>> well, other Iceberg repositories can adopt a similar setup later. >>>> >>>> Any concerns or objections? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Gang >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards >>> Junwang Zhao >>> >>
