+1 (binding)

On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 12:12 AM Gianluca Graziadei <
[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Cheers,
> Gianluca
>
>
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2026, 07:56 Xin Huang via dev, <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 8:35 PM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 5:21 AM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1 (non-binding)
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 1:43 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 9:59 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> +1 (binding)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 12:05 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> +1(binding). Thanks Prashant for working on this. Thanks everyone
>>> for the review.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Yufei
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 12:02 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> +1
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Thanks for working on this, Prashant! It will be great to get this
>>> in to fix up scan planning filters, as well as to support new features like
>>> check constraints!
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Ryan
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 11:48 AM Prashant Singh <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Hey Junwang,
>>> >>>>>> Thank you for the feedback, we responded to your comment, please
>>> have a look !
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Best,
>>> >>>>>> Prashant
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 9:43 PM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Hi Prashant,
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 8:21 AM Prashant Singh <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>> > Hello everyone,
>>> >>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>> > I would like to call a vote to adopt PR #17138, which updates
>>> the REST
>>> >>>>>>> > catalog OpenAPI specification so that its expression schemas
>>> align with
>>> >>>>>>> > the expression grammar defined in the Iceberg expression
>>> specification.
>>> >>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>> > Pull request:
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17138__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!tDi4E1T-C8kJEiZT9P-xjJ2IgV-KpnLwhdA5-I47MN-8znGqz6dg5OPM5FmnUlW8zqXD9BA30L_LZ-Ky_QUOfw$
>>> >>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>> > Thanks a ton to Ryan Blue for authoring / driving the Iceberg
>>> expression
>>> >>>>>>> > specification itself (
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16652__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!tDi4E1T-C8kJEiZT9P-xjJ2IgV-KpnLwhdA5-I47MN-8znGqz6dg5OPM5FmnUlW8zqXD9BA30L_LZ-KCdwKTyg$
>>> ).
>>> >>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>> > The vote will remain open for a minimum of 72 hours.
>>> >>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>> > [ ] +1  Adopt these changes
>>> >>>>>>> > [ ]  0  No opinion
>>> >>>>>>> > [ ] -1  Do not adopt (please provide a reason)
>>> >>>>>>> >
>>> >>>>>>> > Regards,
>>> >>>>>>> > Prashant Singh
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> I post a comment about the `required` fields changes, hope it
>>> makes sense.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>> Regards
>>> >>>>>>> Junwang Zhao
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards
>>> Junwang Zhao
>>>
>>

Reply via email to