+1, thank you for all the work and patience Alex

Thanks,
Prashant

On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 10:17 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 4:03 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please take a minute to vote on this spec change.
>>
>> Casting my own vote: +1 (non-binding).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 10:49 PM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'd like to start a vote to formalize remote signing configuration in
>> > the REST spec.
>> >
>> > The proposed changes introduce a new RemoteSigningConfig object in the
>> > LoadTableResult schema, containing properties and headers that signers
>> > should send back to the signing endpoint.
>> >
>> > The spec changes are in this PR:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16822
>> >
>> > Relevant discussions:
>> >
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/gz5nm2xzlhzbc2y3sfossgflnkbm6vq5
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/krvmczlbwpbn08c45w1dtvr5tor6ol1y
>> >
>> > Many thanks to everyone who provided feedback!
>> >
>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1: Adopt the remote signing configuration changes
>> > [ ] +0: . . .
>> > [ ] -1: Do not adopt the remote signing configuration changes because .
>> . .
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Alex
>>
>

Reply via email to