+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 11:27 AM Hongyue Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 11:01 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:55 AM Matt Butrovich <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Thanks for adding this clarification, Russell -- and to everyone who >>> gave feedback on the PR already. >>> >>> -Matt >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:40 AM Russell Spitzer < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi y'all, >>>> >>>> It's been a while, and I think we already have consensus here >>>> but I wanted to raise this vote for awareness/consensus before merging. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Scan planning has stated since #4272 >>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4272> that duplicate live file >>>> paths in a snapshot produce undefined scan results. This PR makes that >>>> expectation explicit as a snapshot invariant in the main body of the spec.* >>>> >>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Approve the spec clarification in 17198 >>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17198> >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 Do not approve (please provide reasons) >>>> >>>> Thanks for your time, >>>> Russ >>>> >>>> >>>>
