Hi Peter,

It looks good to me.

Regards
JB

On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 9:55 AM Péter Váry <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> As Iceberg 1.12.0 is approaching, we need to finalize the Flink support 
> matrix.
>
> Based on the previous discussions and PRs, my takeaway is that the community 
> generally supports an "LTS + two latest Flink releases" policy:
>
> Iceberg 1.11.0: Flink 1.20, 2.0, 2.1
> Iceberg 1.12.0: Flink 1.20, 2.2, 2.3
>
> The main drawback is that there is no overlap between the Flink 2.x versions, 
> making independent Flink and Iceberg upgrades harder. While not ideal, I 
> think skipping any upgrades is worse.
>
> Unless there are strong objections, I'd like to propose that we adopt this 
> policy and implement the Flink upgrades so the Iceberg 1.12.0 release can 
> proceed.
>
> In the meantime, could someone prepare the upgrade PR? Following our usual 
> approach:
>
> Move Flink 2.1 code to 2.3.
> Remove Flink 2.0 support.
> Copy Flink 2.2 from Flink 2.3.
> Apply any required build and code fixes.
>
> Please speak up if you have concerns with this direction.
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
>
>

Reply via email to