+1 (binding)

Thanks for driving this. Ran the validation scripts, and checked the source and 
binaries by hand. Excited to see this first release!

Kind regards,
Fokko

On 2026/08/28 23:40:59 Alex Stephen via dev wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> I verified that:
> - Licenses + notices look correct on convenience binaries (this was the
> issue for the last RC)
> - Tests pass
> - RAT passes
> - Checksums look good
> 
> Thanks for driving the release, Matt!
> 
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 9:33 PM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I verified:
> >
> > - the source artifact checksum, signature, signing key, and signed
> > annotated tag;
> > - that the source archive matches the advertised commit and contains the
> > expected LICENSE and NOTICE files;
> > - RAT and binary license inventory checks;
> > - the build, unit tests, and integration tests from the downloaded source
> > artifact, including acceptance tests against a real Iceberg REST catalog;
> > - the signed checksums, contents, licensing, target metadata, and commit
> > provenance of all convenience binaries.
> >
> > I found no release-blocking issues.
> >
> 

Reply via email to