+1 (non-binding)

Verified checksums, signature, source archive vs. tag, RAT, and ran
smoke tests with the staged Spark 4.0 runtime.

One follow-up, in the same spirit as Xuanwo's note: the source
archive also bundles site/docs/assets/javascript/lottie-player.js
(LottieFiles, MIT) without a license header or an entry in the root
LICENSE. Not a blocker for this RC since both assets have shipped
since 1.9.0; this issue is already tacked here 
https://lists.apache.org/thread/hstl6z6qp55hxgdlljpc5xg8wc3kq800

Separately, while testing I hit a pre-existing NoSuchMethodError when
reading variant columns with commons-lang3 < 3.13 on the classpath
(iceberg-parquet uses Streams.of(Iterable) without declaring the
dependency). Also present in 1.11.0, so not a regression; issue tracked here 
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/18164 

Cheers,
Gianluca

On 2026/09/18 00:22:06 Neelesh Salian wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache Iceberg
> 1.12.0 release.
> 
> The commit ID is dec392570a88e45ac3a417a487dd72f9bdb629d5
> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.12.0-rc0
> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.12.0-rc0
> *
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/dec392570a88e45ac3a417a487dd72f9bdb629d5
> 
> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.12.0-rc0
> 
> You can find the KEYS file here:
> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
> 
> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository URL
> is:
> * https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1283/
> 
> Please download, verify, and test.
> 
> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here:
> * https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release
> 
> As this vote spans the weekend, it will remain open until Monday, September
> 21, 2026 at 2:00 PM Pacific Time.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.12.0
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> 
> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are
> encouraged to cast
> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 votes and
> more binding
> +1 votes than -1 votes.
> 

Reply via email to