+1 (non-binding)

On Wed, Sep 23, 2026, 11:00 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev <
[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 non-binding
>
> ср, 23 сент. 2026 г., 23:20 rahul mahadev <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd like to call a vote on
>> standardizing the client User-Agent format in the REST catalog spec.
>>
>> What a +1 endorses:
>> - Clients identify themselves with the standard HTTP User-Agent header
>>   (RFC 7231): whitespace-separated product/version tokens, most specific
>>   first (engine, then any integration or connector, then the Iceberg
>>   library, then the runtime), with an optional parenthesized comment for
>>   extra context. Example:
>>
>>     Spark/4.0.0 iceberg-spark/1.9.0 iceberg-java/1.9.0 (scala 2.13.16)
>>
>> - When the header is sent, the Iceberg library token (iceberg-java,
>>   pyiceberg, iceberg-rust, iceberg-go) must be present.
>> - The header is advisory. Servers must not reject a request just because
>>   it is missing or malformed, and must not use it for authentication.
>>   Servers may refuse operations from client versions known to be unsafe.
>>   It is not a capability negotiation mechanism.
>>
>> The spec change is in PR [2]. If the vote passes, the follow-ups are
>> conforming the client libraries (java, python, rust, go) to emit this
>> format.
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1 Adopt this User-Agent format in the REST spec
>> [ ] 0
>> [ ] -1 Do not adopt (please explain)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rahul
>>
>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/d6hkx66o8qc1lolh11l1lmswxlq0bpj9
>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17727
>>
>

Reply via email to