I'm a little confused, https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/18024
explicitly excluded 4.2 from convenience binaries. Was there a reason there?

On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 2:26 PM Neelesh Salian <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Just want to make sure before we jump to another RC.
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14984#pullrequestreview-5108946788
> was the comment around adding Spark 4.2 support for 1.12.
> If the position has changed that we now intend to ship 4.2 with 1.12, then
> I may have missed where that was captured.
> Would be great to clarify before we proceed with this RC or create a new
> one.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 12:21 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah Huaxin is right,  this
>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/main/dev/stage-binaries.sh#L23> needs
>> to be updated to include 4.2 as well. We should do another RC unfortunately.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 1:15 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see any Spark 4.2 artifacts in the staging repository.
>>> iceberg-spark-4.2_2.13, iceberg-spark-extensions-4.2_2.13 and
>>> iceberg-spark-runtime-4.2_2.13 all return 404, while the 3.5, 4.0 and 4.1
>>> equivalents are there.
>>>
>>> dev/stage-binaries.sh has SPARK_VERSIONS=3.5,4.0,4.1, which looks like
>>> it wasn't
>>> updated when Spark 4.2 support landed in #14984. Everything else points
>>> to 4.2
>>> being a supported target for this release: gradle.properties has
>>> defaultSparkVersions=4.2 and knownSparkVersions=3.5,4.0,4.1,4.2,
>>> spark/v4.2 is in
>>> the source tarball, spark42 is pinned to 4.2.0, CI runs the 4.2 test
>>> matrix, and
>>> Spark 4.2.0 is on Maven Central. Spark 4.1 was added and published
>>> together in
>>> 1.11.0.
>>>
>>> Since convenience binaries can't be added after the release, I think this
>>> needs another RC.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Huaxin
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 11:48 AM Anurag Mantripragada <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> 1. Verified signatures and checksums
>>>> 2. Verified licence and RAT
>>>> 3. Ran Spark 4.1 and 4.2 tests
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Neelesh.
>>>>
>>>> ~ Anurag
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 2:10 AM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Verified the archive checksum and signature
>>>>> 2. Extracted and inspected the source code for binaries
>>>>> 3. Compiled the source code
>>>>> 4. Verified license files / headers
>>>>> 5. Ran Flink 2.3 tests
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Neelesh for managing the release!
>>>>>
>>>>> -Max
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 7:19 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > +1 (non-binding)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Verified on Linux x86_64 with JDK 21:
>>>>> > - SHA-512 checksum and GPG signature.
>>>>> > - Source archive matches tag apache-iceberg-1.12.0-rc2 at
>>>>> >   212aa894e919ff9fdf89160da4aadcbe6858ac01, with the documented
>>>>> >   release metadata additions.
>>>>> > - LICENSE, NOTICE, source packaging and RAT checks.
>>>>> > - common, api and core builds passed, with 9,817 tests passing
>>>>> >   and no failures.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > Xuanwo
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to