Hi folks, +1 (binding)
btw, I left few comments in the PR https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17727, and seems like there are few CVE scanining failures, are we blocking on that ? On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 8:26 AM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 3:18 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 12:29 AM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Thanks >>> Szehon >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2026 at 2:44 PM Jones, Danny via dev < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for driving standardization here! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Danny >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From: *Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> >>>> *Reply to: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> *Date: *Monday, 5 October 2026 at 22:31 >>>> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> *Subject: *RE: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] Recommend a standard User-Agent >>>> format for REST clients [REOPEN] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do >>>> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and >>>> know the content is safe. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2026 at 15:23 rahul mahadev <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> [Reopning voting after going through reviews from @adutra] >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd like to call a vote on >>>> standardizing the client User-Agent format in the REST catalog spec. >>>> >>>> What a +1 endorses: >>>> >>>> - Clients identify themselves with the standard HTTP User-Agent header >>>> (RFC 7231): whitespace-separated product/version tokens, most specific >>>> first (engine, then any integration or connector, then the Iceberg >>>> library, then the runtime), with an optional parenthesized comment for >>>> extra context. Example: >>>> >>>> Spark/4.0.0 iceberg-spark/1.9.0 iceberg-java/1.9.0 (scala 2.13.16) >>>> >>>> - When the header is sent, the Iceberg library token (iceberg-java, >>>> pyiceberg, iceberg-rust, iceberg-go) must be present. >>>> - The header is advisory. Servers must not reject a request just because >>>> it is missing or malformed, and must not use it for authentication. >>>> Servers may refuse operations from client versions known to be unsafe. >>>> It is not a capability negotiation mechanism. >>>> >>>> The spec change is in PR [2]. If the vote passes, the follow-ups are >>>> conforming the client libraries (java, python, rust, go) to emit this >>>> format. >>>> >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Adopt this User-Agent format in the REST spec >>>> [ ] 0 >>>> [ ] -1 Do not adopt (please explain) >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Rahul >>>> >>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/d6hkx66o8qc1lolh11l1lmswxlq0bpj9 >>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17727 >>>> >>>>
