+1 (non-binding) and thanks Steven! On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 2:53 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 11:03 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> I support requiring newly committed v4 snapshots to have a timestamp-ms >> strictly greater than their parent on the same branch, while leaving root >> snapshots, pre-upgrade snapshots and v1-v3 behavior unchanged. >> >> Thanks, >> Xuanwo >> >
