+1 (non-binding) Thanks, - Manish
On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 7:01 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Cheers, > Dmitri. > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 10:32 PM youngrae kim <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'd like to start a vote on adding `none` to the allowed values of the >> X-Iceberg-Access-Delegation header in the REST catalog spec: >> >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/18480 >> >> The value `none` signals that the client is able to operate without any >> access delegation mechanism. This follows the discussion in the >> thread "[DISCUSS] REST spec: expected server behavior when >> X-Iceberg-Access-Delegation cannot be satisfied", where Dan and Dmitri >> agreed that only this addition is needed. The PR is approved by Dan, Dmitri >> and Alexandre. >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 Add `none` to the X-Iceberg-Access-Delegation header values >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 I have concerns because ... >> >> Thanks, >> Youngrae >> >
