+1 (non-binding)

On Sat, Oct 31, 2026 at 10:52 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 binding
>
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2026 at 12:00 AM Maninder Parmar <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2026, 7:20 PM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2026 at 1:48 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I propose adding a _last_updated_time metadata column to row lineage
>>> for v4
>>> > tables. It records the timestamp of the snapshot that last updated a
>>> row,
>>> > complementing _last_updated_sequence_number with a wall-clock time.
>>> >
>>> > Summary of the spec change:
>>> > * New reserved metadata column _last_updated_time (timestamptz).
>>> > * New optional tracking field snapshot_timestamp (timestamptz) in v4
>>> manifests.
>>> >   Writers leave it null for added entries and for entries modified by
>>> >   column files. On read, a null value is inherited from the snapshot's
>>> >   timestamp-ms.
>>> > * Upgrading to v4 does not require rewriting manifest lists or
>>> manifests.
>>> >   Pre-v4 metadata is read as if snapshot_timestamp is null, so exising
>>> rows
>>> >   get the timestamp of the last snapshot before the v4 upgrade.
>>> >
>>> > This works well with the earlier v4 spec change that requires
>>> monotonically
>>> > increasing snapshot timestamps (#16294). Because each snapshot's
>>> timestamp-ms
>>> > is strictly greater than its parent's on the same branch,
>>> _last_updated_time
>>> > follows the same order as _last_updated_sequence_number.
>>> >
>>> > This enables queries for when a row was last updated and for
>>> > rows modified since a given time, without mapping sequence numbers
>>> > back to snapshots that may have expired.
>>> >
>>> > Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/18526
>>> >
>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1 Adopt the spec change
>>> > [ ] +0 No preference
>>> > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the spec change (please explain)
>>> >
>>> > Thanks, Steven
>>> >
>>> > Discussion thread:
>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/cln7xtjy9kw2096gzqlg5c4gg8b9td10
>>> >
>>> > Monotonic snapshot timestamp PR:
>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16294
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards
>>> Junwang Zhao
>>>
>>

Reply via email to