+1 for 'instanceName'. 'nodeName' looks confusing as well - I would think that it should be unique among all nodes.
-Val On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com> wrote: > Agree. The term grid to refer to a single node is very confusing. > On 19 Aug 2015 08:58, "Semyon Boikov" <sboi...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > > In my opinion this propery just should be renamed to 'nodeName'. > > Possibility to set node name is very useful in our tests. As I see > > 'setNodeId' is already deprecated in IgniteConfiguration, how we will > > distinguish nodes in our tests? > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > I am thinking of deprecating this property. > > > > > > 1. nodes with different grid names can discover each other and build a > > > single topology. I heard that some of the users expected that there > would > > > be separate topologies > > > 2. Locally started nodes can be accessed via their IDs through Ignition > > > interface. > > > 3. Internally gridName is used in components serialization and > > > deserializaiton, but this is very unreliable and can be broken if > > different > > > names are configured within the same topology - > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10 > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > > >
