In this case, should we just simply update the documentation to reflect the reality?
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Andrey Gura <[email protected]> wrote: > There is the same comment for the following interfaces: > > - IgniteAtomicReference > - IgniteAtomicSequence > - IgniteAtomicStamped > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Igniters, > > > > In *IgniteAtomicLong* I see the following statement: "All previously > > described methods have asynchronous analogs." But there are no async > > operations in it's implemenation. > > > > Is this a bug in documentation of we forgot to implement them? > > > > Vladimir. > > > > > > -- > Andrey Gura > GridGain Systems, Inc. > www.gridgain.com >
