On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Raul, do we really need to require the @author tag? I think it should be
> optional.
>
That's what the coding style said:
"Every type should start with at least minimal Javadoc comments
including description and author information in the following form:"
All I did was fix the example in accordance with the rule. Now you see
where I'm coming from – huh? ;-)
NOTE: I personally dislike this coding style, so this task of helping the
community improve the definitions of something I dislike is arduous for me.
I'm more akin to Google's Java style:
https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html. It's more commonplace,
neutral and less rigid.
Regards,
*Raúl Kripalani*
PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and
Messaging Engineer
http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
