Cos - why mixing the two? I think if we are embark on this route - why not create two different assemblies, one for Hadoop bits, and another for Spark integration? Two would rarely intersect IMHO.
-- Nikita Ivanov On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > While a minor modification which won't affect anything, I'd like to put > on the table the consolidation of hadoodp and spark bits into > ignite-accelerator assembly. The fix is ready and I was just waiting for > 1.4 to come out. > > Cos > > On September 28, 2015 11:11:44 AM PDT, Vladimir Ozerov < > voze...@gridgain.com> wrote: > >I'd like to add several things. > >1) It looks like fix for IBM JVM will brake backward compatibility > >because > >the problem is caused by missing serialVersionId, right? > >2) HP-UX users are also concerned, see last comments in > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1493 I think we must > >adress > >Unsafe refactoring in this release as well. > > > >On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan > ><dsetrak...@apache.org> > >wrote: > > > >> Gianfranco, > >> > >> I am not too familiar with JBPM. Can you make a case on why we may > >need > >> this integration and how it will benefit Ignite users? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> D. > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Gianfranco Murador > ><mura...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I would like to propose the integration with JBPM , > >> > I think I can finish in a couple of weeks since I have a bit of > >time to > >> > devote to Ignite. > >> > Let me know if you agree. > >> > Regards, Gianfranco > >> > > >> > 2015-09-28 18:50 GMT+02:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan > ><dsetrak...@apache.org>: > >> > > >> > > I would like to add one more: > >> > > 10. OSGI integration - Raul Kripalani > >> > > > >> > > Raul, hopefully you will have time to finish it. > >> > > > >> > > Also, if anyone in the community wants to propose a feature they > >are > >> > > working on which can be finished within next couple of weeks, it > >should > >> > get > >> > > into 1.5 as well. > >> > > > >> > > D. > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Yakov Zhdanov > ><yzhda...@apache.org> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Guys! > >> > > > > >> > > > We have finalized 1.4 release! > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks to everyone involved! That was very important release > >for our > >> > > > project. > >> > > > > >> > > > Let's discuss scope for 1.5. > >> > > > > >> > > > I think the main focus areas should be: > >> > > > 1. Optimized marshaller rework - Alex Goncharuk works on this. > >> > > > 2. .Net and Cpp API release (depends on 3) - Vladimir Ozerov > >> > > > 3. Portable API release - Denis Magda and Vladimir > >> > > > 4. Failover for continuous query notifications - Nick Tikhonov > >> > > > 5. Cache Rebalancing optimizations - Anton Vinogradov > >> > > > 6. Fix compatibility with IBM JDK > >> > > > 7. Cache stability and performance fixes (as many as possible) > >> > > > > >> > > > Nice to have: > >> > > > 8. Finish vert.x integration - Andrey Gura works on this. > >> > > > 9. Finish node.js integration - I think Semyon should pass it > >over to > >> > > > someone else, given he is busy with cache. Anyone? Andrey Gura? > >> > > > > >> > > > Comments are welcome! > >> > > > > >> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-950 > >> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1282 > >> > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1258 > >> > > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-426 > >> > > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1093 > >> > > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-324 > >> > > > [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1526 > >> > > > [7] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1345 > >> > > > [8] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1079 > >> > > > [9] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-961 > >> > > > > >> > > > --Yakov > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Gianfranco Murador > >> > Igniter and Software Engineer. > >> > > >> >
