Raul, good point!

I have no information about .Net trademark, but other products use ".NET"
without a blank space.

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Raul Kripalani <[email protected]> wrote:

> I like Ignite.NET.
>
> I wonder if the .NET portion may be trademarked by Microsoft. If that's the
> case, I guess we cannot put a blank space between Ignite and .NET (Ignite
> .NET), it'll all need to be a single word, like proposed.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Raúl Kripalani*
> PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and
> Messaging Engineer
> http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > Let's agree on the final name of our .Net product. For now it is
> referenced
> > in various places as "Apache Ignite .Net", "Apache Ignite for .Net",
> > "Apache Ignite .Net platform", etc..
> >
> > Ports of other Java projects to .Net are usually named as
> "[Product].NET".
> > E.g. Akka.NET, Spring.NET.
> >
> > I suggest use the same scheme and pick the name "Apache Ignite.NET".
> >
> > Any ideas or objections?
> >
> > Vladimir.
> >
>

Reply via email to