Thanks, Chandresh, for pointing this out. We also have benchmark results, which look very different:
https://ignite.apache.org/benchmarks/ignite-vs-hazelcast.html The main issue here, is that the shown results are for HZ 3.6, which has not been released yet. I suspect that they have done some performance improvements there, but we have not been standing still either :) I think we should re-run HZ 3.6 benchmarks against Ignite 1.5 and see what happens. We can probably do it in a week or so, when we will be closer with 1.5. D. On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:20 PM, chandresh pancholi < chandreshpancholi...@gmail.com> wrote: > My team uses Hazelcast for in memory data grid. i am also wanted to do > comparison with ignite and publish result sometime in next month. > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 07:36PM, Kostya Kulagin wrote: > > > Was this in or off heap test? > > > > That's exactly why I asked the OP to share his thoughts - otherwise, it > is > > just a slightly amusing reading at best ;) > > > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > It is pretry cool to see companies out there using Ignite and > comparing > > > > themselves to Iginite. That clearly sets Ignite as the poster child > of > > the > > > > in-memory computing. And that's exactly what an Apache project should > > be. > > > > Thanks for sharing! > > > > > > > > But perhaps you wanted to also express some thoughts by sending this > > > > around? It is hard to guess what they were from just looking at the > > link. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Cos > > > > > > > > On October 25, 2015 11:26:38 AM PDT, chandresh pancholi < > > > > chandreshpancholi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >https://hazelcast.com/resources/benchmark-gridgain/ > > > > > > > > > > -- > Chandresh Pancholi > Senior Software Engineer > Flipkart.com > Email-id:chandresh.panch...@flipkart.com > Contact:08951803660 >
