Dmitriy,
>> How about we check that dashcode is not 0 when storing portable keys in
cache?
And print warning in log? Sounds good for me.
-----
But I will try to describe once again my concern.
I'm don't know anything about portables. So, I open javadoc and see some
idiomatic code like this:
builder = ...
for ( fileds) {
builder.setField(..)
}
portable = builder.build();
And I in my PojoStore I do as described.
If there was a NOTE in javadoc about hashCode() it will save 4 hours of
debug for me :)
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]>
wrote:
> How about we check that dashcode is not 0 when storing portable keys in
> cache?
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Andrey, thanks.
> >
> > Actually I use this not well documented method to solve my problem.
> >
> > And I'm proposed to at least add more info for PortableBuilder about this
> > method.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Andrey Kornev <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Alexey,
> > >
> > > PortableBuilder has an (un-documented) method hashCode(int hashCode)
> that
> > > should be used to explicitly set the hashCode for the portable instance
> > > being built. I'm not sure why this has been designed this way, but I'm
> > > guessing that since the PortableBuilder is pretty dumb and it wouldn't
> > know
> > > which fields to use for hash code computation (in some cases you'd only
> > > want to include specific portable fields rather than all fields).
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Andrey
> > >
> > > > Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:49:07 +0700
> > > > Subject: Portables hash code.
> > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > Igniters,
> > > >
> > > > I'm working on [1] "IGNITE-1753 Rework CacheJdbcPojoStore to new
> API."
> > > >
> > > > And one of subtasks is to support portable objects with JDBC store.
> > > >
> > > > I implemented this and during tests found a huge performance drop
> when
> > I
> > > > have PortableObject as key.
> > > >
> > > > After some debugging I found that all my portable objects have
> hashCode
> > > = 0.
> > > > I'm using PortableBuilder to build my portable objects.
> > > >
> > > > And I expected that PortableBuilder will calculate proper hash code
> for
> > > me
> > > > out of the box.
> > > >
> > > > I think we should at least describe in PortableBuilder javadocs that
> by
> > > > default PortableBuilder will return zero hashcode?
> > > >
> > > > Or we should calculate hashcode in PortableBuilder.build() method?
> > > >
> > > > Or may be we could add boolean argument PortableBuilder.build(boolean
> > > > generateHashCode)?
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > P.S. After I added manual hashcode calculation to my
> CacheJdbcPojoStore
> > > > performance drop is gone away.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1753
> > > > --
> > > > Alexey Kuznetsov
> > > > GridGain Systems
> > > > www.gridgain.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexey Kuznetsov
> > GridGain Systems
> > www.gridgain.com
> >
>
--
Alexey Kuznetsov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com
