How about @CachePut, @Caching, @CacheConfig, and @CacheEvict annotations listed here:
http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/4.2.0.RC1/spring-framework-reference/htmlsingle/#cache-annotations-put We support all these? D. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Andrey Gura <[email protected]> wrote: > Oops, I didn't noticed. > > Ok, it means we already have this integration. > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Andrey, we already have this. See SpringCacheManager class. > > > > -Val > > > > On Thursday, November 5, 2015, Andrey Gura <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > @Cacheable is not Spring Boot annotation. It's part of spring-context > > > module. > > > > > > If client want use @Cacheable annotation in Spring based project he > > should > > > configure cache manager in application context. > > > > > > Cache manager should implement org.springframework.cache.CacheManager > > > interface. So we need implement it in order to provide Ignite based > > caching > > > to Spring users. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > [email protected] > > > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > I am aware that Ignite supports Spring @Cacheable annotation. Does it > > > mean > > > > that Ignite integrated with Spring boot? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/1.3.0.M1/reference/html/boot-features-caching.html > > > > > > > > If not, we should definitely add such integration. > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Andrey Gura > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > > > > > -- > Andrey Gura > GridGain Systems, Inc. > www.gridgain.com >
