On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Vladimir, I think it is unclear how one approach is better than the other
> apart from just being different. I would avoid undertaking this type of
> restructuring unless we have a really compelling reason.
>
I need three modules for OSGi:
* ignite-osgi-support => provides an IgniteOsgiHelper in a manner similar
to IgniteSpringHelper.
* ignite-osgi-karaf-features => a Maven module of POM packaging which
simply provides a features.xml for quick installation in Karaf.
* ignite-osgi-paxlogging-fragment => a fragment for Pax Logging that
exposes the extra packages from log4j that Ignite uses
(o.a.log4j.[varia/xml]).
It would clutter the modules folder to have them at that level. So I
suggest:
modules
|---------- osgi
|--------- support
|--------- karaf-features
|--------- paxlogging-fragment
Regards,
*Raúl Kripalani*
PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and
Messaging Engineer
http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
