On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Alexey Goncharuk < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > This would not be backward compatible. Essentially, everyone switching to > > the new version of Ignite would be required to rewrite their store > > implementation. I still think that introducing CacheBinaryStore is the > most > > elegant solution here. > > > Dmitriy, > > Do I understand correctly that you suggest CacheBinaryStore be just an > empty extension of CacheStore interface? > Yes, with proper documentation explaining its purpose.
