Yeah, I am pretty sure you can. One point though: the release process is better be updated to push the release tag under refs/tags/rel as explained below.
Regards, Cos On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 07:16PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > FYI > > Can we delete the unused GIT branches now? > > D. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Nalley <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:00 AM > Subject: Git status update > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > Greeting PMCs: > (bcc to [email protected]) > > Following direction from the Board, Infrastructure has modified git to > permit force pushes, and branch/tag deletion. > > In accordance with the guidance that the Board we've implemented a few > changes you should be aware of: > > First, If a forced commit is pushed, the subsequent commit email will > contain '[Forced Update!]' in the subject line. The hope here is that > it draws extra attention to the situation for a project community to > be aware, and take appropriate action if needed. > > Second, we've changed the 'protected' portions of git to primarily > focus on refs/tags/rel - thus any tags under rel, will have their > entire commit history. This provides the provenance that the ASF needs > for releases, while still giving projects the ability to mold their > repository in the way they see fit. > > Thus when a release vote is successful - part of the release process > should become tagging the voted upon commit SHA under rel/ to make it > indelible. ('# git tag rel/v15.4.2 ' or something similar.) > > > If you have questions, please feel free to email [email protected] > > > --David > on behalf of Apache Infrastructure
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
