The performance of AtomicSequence is very good as most of the operations are local. The way it works is that it will reserve a range of numbers by sending a request, but then will return all new IDs locally, until the reserved range is exhausted.
More information here: https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/id-generator D. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:54 AM, 李玉珏@163 <18624049...@163.com> wrote: > Hi： > > Oh, sorry, wrong title. > > 在 16/1/19 16:50, Dmitriy Setrakyan 写道: > >> Yujue Li, what exactly would you like to benchmark? Is it the >> IgniteAtomicSequence or IgniteAtomicReference? Also, benchmarks are better >> viewed in comparison to something else. Is there something else in >> particular you would like to compare these data structures to? >> >> D. >> >> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 7:31 PM, 李玉珏 <18624049...@163.com> wrote: >> >> Hi: >>> >>> About IgniteAtomicReference, I think the function in the existing >>> distributed ID generator advantage is very obvious, if converted to >>> hexadecimal, can do a very short。 >>> >>> I would like to ask, is there a particular description about the >>> performance? Did the benchmark test on a specific hardware? >>> >> > >
