I've populated FAQ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/FAQ
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Christos Erotocritou < > chris...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > > We already have a basic FAQ page which I am populating: > > http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/docs/faq < > > http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/docs/faq> > > > > Please feel free to add to it. > > > > Thanks Christos! Here is the correct link (your link is just an alias): > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/faq > > I think we should add a TOC up top as well, whenever you are done. > > > > Not sure if we want to migrate this to the wiki? > > > > I don’t think we need to. > > > > > > Christos > > > > > On 11 Mar 2016, at 17:35, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 on FAQ > > > > > > Can we just create a page, and start populating it? > > > > > > D. > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Anton Vinogradov < > > avinogra...@gridgain.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Yakov, > > >> > > >> I've answered. > > >> Seems we have to have special FAQ section at Ignite wiki to publish > same > > >> things. > > >> > > >> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Vlad and all (esp Val and Anton V.), > > >>> > > >>> I reviewed the PR. My comments are in the ticket. > > >>> > > >>> Anton V. there is a question regarding > optimized-classnames.properties. > > >>> Can you please respond in ticket? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> --Yakov > > >>> > > >>> 2016-02-29 16:00 GMT+06:00 Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org>: > > >>> > > >>>> Vlad, that's great! I will take a look this week. Reassigning ticket > > to > > >>>> myself. > > >>>> > > >>>> --Yakov > > >>>> > > >>>> 2016-02-26 18:37 GMT+03:00 Vladisav Jelisavcic <vladis...@gmail.com > >: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Hi, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> i recently implemented distributed ReentrantLock - IGNITE-642, > > >>>>> i made a pull request, so hopefully this could be added to the next > > >>>>> release. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>> Vladisav > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Alexey Goncharuk < > > >>>>> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Folks, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The current implementation of IgniteCache.lock(key).lock() has the > > >>>>> same > > >>>>>> semantics as the transactional locks - cache topology cannot be > > >>>>> changed > > >>>>>> while there exists an ongoing transaction or an explicit lock is > > >>>>> held. The > > >>>>>> restriction for transactions is quite fundamental, the lock() > issue > > >>>>> can be > > >>>>>> fixed if we re-implement locking the same way IgniteSemaphore > > >>>>> currently > > >>>>>> works. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> As for the "Failed to find semaphore with the given name" message, > > my > > >>>>> first > > >>>>>> guess is that DataStructures were configured with 1 backups which > > led > > >>>>> to > > >>>>>> the data loss when two nodes were stopped. Mario, can you please > > >>>>> re-test > > >>>>>> your semaphore scenario with 2 backups configured for data > > structures? > > >>>>>> From my side, I can also take a look at the semaphore issue when > I'm > > >>>>> done > > >>>>>> with IGNITE-2610. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
