Huge +1 for dropping support for null in all names, not only for cache names. Do we have ticket for this one?
Sergi On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Andrey Velichko <[email protected]> wrote: > > 15.07.2016 0:31, Dmitriy Setrakyan пишет: > >> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:26 AM, AndreyVel<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Good feature may be Aggregated cache - analog materialized view in DBMS >>> Aggregated cache is great for performance (KPI, analytecal reports). >>> >>> Do you mean a copy of the aggregated data in another cache? What happens >> when the data in the original caches is updated? >> >> >> > Yes, aggregated data can be store in another cache, > embedded aggregating cache can be updated sync/async. Aggregating from the > box has better performance then creating custom event listeners. > > If cache entry updated/deleted aggregate listener can get 2 values old and > new. >
