Anton, compile-time annotations should mean that Ignite should not require
these libraries at runtime. Did you try it already and run into issues?

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com>
wrote:

> Possible, what's the solution in this case?
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Sergi Vladykin <sergi.vlady...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I don't think that JB annotations is a runtime dependency, we should need
> > them only at compile time, no?
> >
> > Sergi
> >
> > 2016-07-28 11:09 GMT+03:00 Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > As you may know we had only 2 dependencies at ignite-core: jcache and
> > > ignite-shmen.
> > >
> > > IGNITE-3323 Get rid of copypasted JB annotations, use dependency
> instead.
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3323> brings one more
> > > dependency to org.jetbrains.annotations.
> > > This solves problems for people using JB annotations at their projects.
> > but
> > > makes ignite-core less dependency-lightweight.
> > >
> > > JB annotaions are used to highlight null problems in IDE and provide
> some
> > > understanding to users on whether null is allowed/possible in concrete
> > > place. I doubt other products/frameworks use it much.
> > >
> > > But, do we really need them? As for me, we can replace all these
> > > annotations by asserts.
> > >
> > > I propose to discontinue usage of jb annotation and replace them by
> > > asserts.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to