Anton, compile-time annotations should mean that Ignite should not require these libraries at runtime. Did you try it already and run into issues?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Possible, what's the solution in this case? > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Sergi Vladykin <sergi.vlady...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > I don't think that JB annotations is a runtime dependency, we should need > > them only at compile time, no? > > > > Sergi > > > > 2016-07-28 11:09 GMT+03:00 Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>: > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > As you may know we had only 2 dependencies at ignite-core: jcache and > > > ignite-shmen. > > > > > > IGNITE-3323 Get rid of copypasted JB annotations, use dependency > instead. > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3323> brings one more > > > dependency to org.jetbrains.annotations. > > > This solves problems for people using JB annotations at their projects. > > but > > > makes ignite-core less dependency-lightweight. > > > > > > JB annotaions are used to highlight null problems in IDE and provide > some > > > understanding to users on whether null is allowed/possible in concrete > > > place. I doubt other products/frameworks use it much. > > > > > > But, do we really need them? As for me, we can replace all these > > > annotations by asserts. > > > > > > I propose to discontinue usage of jb annotation and replace them by > > > asserts. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > >