Hi, Valentin. I am going to close these ticket with some prototype and create new ones (maybe, with umbrella one).
Will it work? On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eduard, > > This is too much information :) > > I think you should create separate tickets for different aspects of Spring > Data integration and use IGNITE-1192 only as an umbrella, because otherwise > it will be flooded by comments. This will allow to implement this > functionality step by step and track the progress better. > > Agree? > > -Val > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Eduard Shangareev < > eduard.shangar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So there is no async support for query, therefore we can't support > futures > > as return type (paragraph 2). > > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Eduard Shangareev < > > eduard.shangar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I have looked at Querydsl and QbE and I think their support should be > > > postponed. > > > > > >
