Hi Subru, There is a response from me in the thread: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Question-on-serializibility-constraint-for-key-values-in-Ignite-JCache-td6434.html
Please respond there if you have follow up questions. -Val On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Subru Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > Trying dev group as didn't get any response from the user group. > > Any pointers will be helpful. > > Thanks, > Subru > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Subru Krishnan <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 6:30 PM > Subject: Question on serializibility constraint for key-values in Ignite > JCache > To: [email protected] > > > Hi, > > I am working on scaling YARN through Federation (YARN-2915 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2915>) and as part of it was > looking for a JCache provider for a local cache for the Federation > StateStore. > > I found Ignite interesting but hit a constraint with my cache entities not > being serializable when I tried to bootstrap an Ignite based JCache. IIUC > JCache spec does not mandate this constraint. Moreover I tried ehcache and > didn't hit this issue. > > Is there a workaround this restriction as my cache is purely local? Or is > there an option to plugin protocol buffers as the serialization provider? I > skimmed the docs/code but couldn't find a solution so I thought I'll check > out the mailing list. > > Thanks, > Subru >
