On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. It is interesting that there is a clean > implementation of that API available but glad to hear it. We'll complete > the APache NiFi integration with Apache Ignite once that jar gets > incorporated in an official release. Thanks > Sounds good. Ignite 2.0 will likely be out in November. > > On 2016-08-25 13:21 (-0400), Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > There is a ticket to switch to the geronimo jar for Ignite 2.0: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2949 > > > > In general, you can just replace the jcache jar with the geronimo jcache > > jar in the mean time. > > > > We could not replace it in the recent 1.7 release because of some > > serialization issues within already running clusters. However, if you are > > starting out, you should be OK with the geronimo jcache jar as it is > fully > > compatible from API standpoint. > > > > D. > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Ignite Devs, > > > > > > In evaluating integration with Apache Ignite we discovered a > questionable > > > jar 'cache-api-1.0.0.jar'. There are threads which clearly indicate > it is > > > known that this library uses a non ASF and ASLv2 licensing friendly > > > license. That jar is licensed under here > > > > > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/master/ > LICENSE.txt > > > > > > You even have binary convenience bundles which include it and you > point to > > > it here in your NOTICE file > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=blob_ > > > plain;f=assembly/LICENSE_FABRIC;hb=de8684390cb2c5664f4bb8401f4169 > > > e930a07e10 > > > > > > There are also threads where it is discussed just how problematic it is > > > both at the JSR level and by the Ignite community. > > > > > > https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/issues/333 > > > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ignite- > > > cache-api-licensing-issue-td3306.html > > > > > > I don't see a JIRA to resolve this in Ignite or in Apache Legal. So > can > > > you help me understand if I am missing an important detail or > exemption? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Joe > > > > > >
