Denis, I will think on this, thank you. And I will initiate another thread in a meanwhile to collect everyone's opinions on what they expect from this redesign.
Roman On Sunday, November 20, 2016 2:34 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: Rather then implementing one more processor (for Redis) I would finally renew our existing REST API that is far from an ideal state https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3879 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3879> Roman, are you interested in taking over IGNITE-3879? Definitely, the community will help with the design and implementation. — Denis > On Nov 19, 2016, at 5:02 AM, Roman Shtykh <rsht...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Alexey, > > I also think this is the way to go. Thank you. Any other opinions? > > Roman > > > > On Saturday, November 19, 2016 8:21 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov > <akuznet...@apache.org> wrote: > Roman, > > I think we should better implement REDIS processor (if needed) and use > Ignite API directly. > In this case we will not be limited by current REST implementation. > Also calling Ignite API directly should be faster (I think). > > > -- > Alexey Kuznetsov
