Alexey The optional module means that we can copy it in libs and it will provide its functionality. What new functionality provides empty directory?
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov <akuznet...@apache.org> wrote: > Sergey, > > As far as I know "ignite-cassandra" is a root folder. > > "ignite-cassandra-store" - contains module with Cassandra store. > "ignite-cassandra-serializers" - module that contains optional serializers > for Cassandra store (for example with Kryo). > it is implemented as separate (optional) module because of Kryo based > serializers may bring not needed dependency. > > Igor, could you confirm this? > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in >> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see following >> unclear points >> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only >> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store? In >> that case why do not make one module? >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko < >> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in >> > 1.8 branch). >> > >> > Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull >> > requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed). >> > >> > - Alex >> > >> > >> > >> > 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com>: >> > > Hi >> > > >> > > I found two issues for 1.8: >> > > IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message >> > because >> > > node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304> >> > > IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result >> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303> >> > > >> > > Could someone experienced take a look? >> > > >> > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov < >> voze...@gridgain.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Folks, >> > >> >> > >> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several >> > problems >> > >> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in >> > ignite-1.8 >> > >> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next >> > >> release (1.9, 2.0?). >> > >> >> > >> Any objections? >> > >> >> > >> Vladimir. >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <isap...@gridgain.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > Denis, >> > >> > >> > >> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But >> now >> > we >> > >> > have some >> > >> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. >> There >> > >> is a >> > >> > ticket for >> > >> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there. >> > >> > >> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288 >> > >> > >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > >> > Igor >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > Alexander, >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen! >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? >> Can I >> > >> > start >> > >> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct? >> > >> > > >> > >> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability < >> > >> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability> >> > >> > > >> > >> > > — >> > >> > > Denis >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko < >> > >> > > alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Folks, >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now >> good >> > to >> > >> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be >> > >> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new >> > features >> > >> on >> > >> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly): >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268 >> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269 >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > On failing tests: >> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294? >> > >> > > focusedCommentId=15683377 >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > - Alex >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko >> > >> > > > <alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com>: >> > >> > > >> Vlad, >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> Most likely today. >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> - Alex >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov < >> voze...@gridgain.com >> > >: >> > >> > > >>> Igniters, >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems >> > that >> > >> we >> > >> > > are >> > >> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest >> > >> remaining >> > >> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for >> > 1.8 >> > >> as >> > >> > > soon >> > >> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might >> > >> happen? >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > > >>> Vladimir. >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294 >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda < >> dma...@apache.org >> > > >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > > >>>> Roman, >> > >> > > >>>> >> > >> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. >> Recently >> > >> > there >> > >> > > was >> > >> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties >> > >> related >> > >> > to >> > >> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation >> versions >> > >> > > co-exist at >> > >> > > >>>> the same time. >> > >> > > >>>> >> > >> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the >> > >> > > documentation >> > >> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a >> > hidden >> > >> > page >> > >> > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible >> > once >> > >> the >> > >> > > next >> > >> > > >>>> version is created after the release. >> > >> > > >>>> >> > >> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a >> > suffix >> > >> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will >> create >> > >> > > readme.io < >> > >> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible. >> > >> > > >>>> >> > >> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. >> > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- >> > >> td10868.html >> > >> > < >> > >> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. >> > >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- >> > >> > td10868.html> >> > >> > > >>>> >> > >> > > >>>> — >> > >> > > >>>> Denis >> > >> > > >>>> >> > >> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh >> > >> > <rsht...@yahoo.com.INVALID >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >>>> wrote: >> > >> > > >>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>> Denis, >> > >> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features? >> > >> > > >>>>> -Roman >> > >> > > >>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda < >> > >> > > >>>> dma...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > > >>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>> Igor, >> > >> > > >>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged >> > into >> > >> 1.8 >> > >> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the >> overall >> > >> merge >> > >> > > >>>> happens. >> > >> > > >>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>> — >> > >> > > >>>>> Denis >> > >> > > >>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego < >> > isap...@gridgain.com> >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>> Denis, >> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML >> they >> > >> will >> > >> > > >>>> break tests >> > >> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing >> that >> > >> before >> > >> > > DML >> > >> > > >>>> is merged. >> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to >> merge my >> > >> > > changes >> > >> > > >>>> and check >> > >> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests >> and >> > >> > > examples >> > >> > > >>>> are ready. >> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>> Best Regards, >> > >> > > >>>>>> Igor >> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn < >> > >> > > ptupit...@apache.org >> > >> > > >>>> <mailto:ptupit...@apache.org>> wrote: >> > >> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: >> CacheEntryProcessor >> > >> > binary >> > >> > > >>>> mode) >> > >> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for >> 1.8. >> > >> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. >> > But I >> > >> > > can't >> > >> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet. >> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews. >> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 < >> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128> >> > >> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 < >> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825> >> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda < >> > dma...@apache.org >> > >> > > >>>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org>> wrote: >> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,* >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related >> changes >> > >> into >> > >> > > 1.8 >> > >> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] >> > documentation >> > >> > > and be >> > >> > > >>>> sure >> > >> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side. >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,* >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET >> > >> > usability >> > >> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache >> Ignite >> > >> > users? >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 < >> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 < >> > >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> — >> > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda < >> > dma...@gridgain.com >> > >> > > <mailto: >> > >> > > >>>> dma...@gridgain.com>> wrote: >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who >> can >> > >> take >> > >> > > over >> > >> > > >>>> the >> > >> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8? >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> — >> > >> > > >>>>>>> Denis >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko < >> > >> > > >>>>>>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com <mailto: >> > alexander.a.paschenko@ >> > >> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML: >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is >> > mostly >> > >> > > about >> > >> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify >> > >> > streamer's >> > >> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved >> > easily). >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir. >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary >> > hash >> > >> > codes >> > >> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 >> branch, >> > I >> > >> > will >> > >> > > ask >> > >> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in >> > >> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as >> follows: >> > >> > > >>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing >> > >> > > >>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity >> > >> > > >>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing >> > >> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version >> of >> > auto >> > >> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these >> very >> > >> > hashing >> > >> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests >> passed. >> > So >> > >> > > could >> > >> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look? >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code. >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> - Alex >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>> >> > >> > > >>>>> >> > >> > > >>>> >> > >> > > >>>> >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Sergey Kozlov >> > > GridGain Systems >> > > www.gridgain.com >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Sergey Kozlov >> GridGain Systems >> www.gridgain.com >> > > > > -- > Alexey Kuznetsov > -- Sergey Kozlov GridGain Systems www.gridgain.com
