I haven't forgotten. Just got back from a business trip. Will start a vote
this week.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Cos, I will start the vote soon. A bit over occupied with travel and
> holidays at this moment.
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Ok,
>>
>> This was a great discussion, thanks for the deep insight, Roman!
>>
>> looks like this thread has stewed for a while and it is time to [VOTE].
>> The
>> following candidates were put forward during the [DISCUSS] (in the order
>> of
>> their appearance on the thread):
>>
>>   Dmitriy Setrakyan
>>   Vladimir Ozerov
>>   Konstantin Boudnik
>>   Valentin Kulichenko
>>   Denis Magda
>>   Branko Čibej
>>
>> Considering the number of the candidates I propose to use
>> First-past-the-post
>> voting, with a single-round/single winner rules, where the candidate
>> collecting the most votes (not the majority) wins. [1]
>>
>> Dmitriy, would you do the honors and start the formal [VOTE]?
>>
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-past-the-post_voting
>>
>> Thanks,
>>   Cos
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:19PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
>> > <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > While all the candidates suggested so far look good, I would propose
>> Denis
>> > > Magda as the next PMC chair. His participation in the project does
>> not only
>> > > have to do with the code, but also with Ignite project overall,
>> including
>> > > website, documentation, new tickets, design, etc.
>> >
>> > Sorry to come to this thread rather late, but I wanted to offer a
>> somewhat
>> > different perspective that hopefully can help reframe this discussion
>> > a little bit.
>> > Note, that what I'm about to say is coming from a non-coding (on
>> Ignite) member
>> > of the PMC. In fact, I stayed on the PMC after graduation more with my
>> ASF
>> > member hat on, rather than as somebody who wanted to directly contribute
>> > to where the technology was going. My concern during your incubation
>> days
>> > was (and still is!) how well are you guys doing on the community
>> development
>> > front.
>> >
>> > If you recall, the diversity requirement (the fact that more than 80%
>> of project
>> > members work for the same company) came up during our graduation. While
>> > it wasn't a blocking requirement it still was a very valid concern.
>> Monocultures
>> > are really nasty for open source communities.
>> >
>> > I think it would be fair to say that Ignite community hasn't really
>> > improved much
>> > diversity-wise since its graduation. And I honestly feel that this is,
>> > to a larger
>> > extent, because the focus is now missing. It was well understood that
>> in order
>> > to graduate the community had to do all it can to demonstrate a
>> > positive trajectory
>> > in that direction. And we did. But we kind of dropped the ball on it
>> since.
>> >
>> > With that in mind, I offer my view on what a change in the Chair could
>> > offer: a renewed
>> > focus on community growth and development. If you agree with this
>> premise than
>> > somebody like Branko or Cos who could act as a forcing function to
>> constantly
>> > remind us about what else can we do to grow and develop this community
>> would
>> > be an ideal choice for the Chair (after all Branko's "tough love" was
>> > probably the
>> > most useful part of Ignite's experience in the Incubator).
>> >
>> > Now, of course, strictly speaking you don't have to be a Chair to do
>> > that. But lets
>> > face it -- that helps. And besides, a project's Chair doesn't really
>> > have any special
>> > powers when it comes to technological consensus, but anything that has
>> to do
>> > with external community the VP title that the chair gets can help quite
>> a bit.
>> >
>> > Long story short: if Branko or Cos (as former mentors) would like to
>> > commit to 6 more
>> > months of the same hands-on mentorship focused on community development
>> -- they
>> > would have my wholehearted support.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Roman (with my PMC member hat on).
>>
>
>

Reply via email to