Alex, > On Dec 29, 2016, at 1:37 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > The subject of this discussion is to determine whether the PageMemory > approach is a way to go, because the this implementation is almost 2x > slower than current 2.0 branch.
What is the main reason for that? Some architecture flaw you didn’t consider before or performance issues that have to be cleaned up? — Denis
