Roman, Do you have any progress on this? It will be perfect to have the feature in 1.9. Please join the discussion: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-1-9-td14170.html <http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-1-9-td14170.html>
β Denis > On Jan 11, 2017, at 5:09 PM, Roman Shtykh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Denis, > Yes, I plan to complete it by that time. > #Btw, RocketMQ first release (4.0.0) under Apache license is planned for this > month. Roman > > On Thursday, January 12, 2017 7:30 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Roman, > > Makes perfect sense to me. Do you think we can release this feature in the > nearest AI release (1.9 or 2.0) around February/March? > > β > Denis > >> On Jan 10, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Roman Shtykh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Denis, >> I think our Kafka integration is the closest to what may be required for >> RockerMQ. But also I wouldn't exclude expanding to Camel's approach in >> future, thanks a lot for pointing to it! >> Let's have it with other streamers as Yakov suggested, and let's discuss >> again if something fancy is requested ;) >> I will create a JIRA issue for that and ask RocketMQ developers for reviews >> and suggestions from their side. Roman >> >> On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 12:12 PM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> Roman, >> >> Does it make sense to have corresponding integration modules in both >> projects? >> >> For instance, there is Camel and Ignite integration that is hosted in both >> projects. >> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/camel >> https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite >> <https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite> >> >> I do believe that the modules are not 100% identical and the reason itβs >> done this way might be because the modules use different Camel or Ignite >> interfaces and concepts. Is this approach somehow related to RocketMQ and >> Ignite? >> >> β >> Denis >> >>> On Jan 9, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Roman Shtykh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Igniters, >>> Recently I am looking into a new pub/sub messaging Apache incubator project >>> called RocketMQ [1], originally developed at Alibaba. And I am thinking >>> about implementing a streamer for Ignite. >>> Do you think it has to be placed under modules/ of Ignite project, or >>> better to have it together with other RocketMQ Community Projects [2]? I >>> talked to the project's lead -- any approach seems to be ok. >>> I anticipate quite frequent releases of the project this year (much more >>> frequent than Ignite's), and I think it will be easier to release such >>> integration updates with the 2nd approach, as soon as a new RocketMQ's (or >>> Ignite's) version is available. >>> Any thoughts? >>> [1] http://rocketmq.apache.org/[2] https://github.com/rocketmq >>> Roman >> >> > >
