Hello Ignite devs, I created new subtask <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4758> under IGNITE-3477 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3477> with my vision of how *MemoryPolicy* may be implemented.
In a nutshell my idea is as follows: instead of having only one instance of *PageMemory* and managing a mapping [cacheId->pageMemory region] I suggest introducing separate *PageMemory* instance (and corresponding *FreeList* and *ReuseList* structures) for each *MemoryPolicy* configuration. This instance will be stored in individual cache contexts instead of shared cache context as it is right now. I think this design is a very natural extension of *PageMemory* concept and should not introduce any performance degradation as no changes are introduced into *PageMemory* implementation itself. Please share any thoughts or concerns about suggested design in this thread or in comments under the subtask <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4758>. Thanks, Sergey.
