Vadim, Please prepare a pull-request and make sure that the test passes on TeamCity.
— Denis > On Mar 10, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Вадим Опольский <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello everyone! > > Denis, I've successfully executed GridFailFastNodeFailureDetectionSelfTest in > IDE 10 times on VMware Workstation (3 GB RAM, Intel Core i5-2520M) in single > core mode with 300 MILLISECONDS timeout. > > What's the next step ? > > Vadim > > > 2017-03-07 22:25 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > Vadim, > > The timeout should be such that the test completes successfully on single > core machine as well as on multi-core servers. Setting timeout to 3 - 5 > seconds should work. > > — > Denis > >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:55 AM, Вадим Опольский <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Denis, >> >> I'm planning to adjust processing time of incoming and outgoing messages by >> JMH benchmarks. >> >> What do you think are the parameters of commodity hardware/? RAM size? CPU >> speed ? or others ? >> >> Vadim >> >> 2017-03-06 22:36 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> Vadim, >> >> How do you plan to adjust processing time of incoming and outgoing messages? >> In general, I don’t think that you need to move the direction of the >> communication layer. >> >> I’m thinking that you just need to set some reasonable awaiting time so that >> the test passes on a commodity hardware. >> >> — >> Denis >> >>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 2:31 AM, Вадим Опольский <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi everyone! >>> >>> I executed test GridFailFastNodeFailureDetectionSelfTest.testFailFast fails >>> periodically with different values of node quantity and awaiting time. Test >>> fails if the awaiting time is less than 600 miliseconds. >>> I debugged test and understood that messaging took a lot of time in this >>> case. >>> I want to measure (with >>> GridFailFastNodeFailureDetectionSelfTest.testFailFast) and increase speed >>> of receiving and sending message. >>> >>> Denis, what do you think about it ? >>> >>> Vadim Opolski >>> >>> >>> 2017-02-24 5:55 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >>> Hi Vadim, >>> >>> Yes, this issue might be still relevant. I can’t guide you through but, >>> basically, you need to reproduce the issue, spot it in the code and propose >>> a fix. >>> >>> BTW, do you have any experience with Hibernate? If so, I would be amazing >>> if you pick up this ticket reassigning on yourself: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794>> >>> >>> — >>> Denis >>> >>> > On Feb 23, 2017, at 2:40 AM, Вадим Опольский <[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Dear sirs ! >>> > >>> > I want to resolve issue IGNITE-933 >>> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-933 >>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-933> >>> > >>> > Is it actual ? >>> > >>> > In which class and method you want me to make changes ? >>> > >>> > Vadim Opolski > >
