On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Alexey Goncharuk < alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Which user operation would result in exception? To my knowledge, user may > > already be holding the lock and not invoking any Ignite APIs, no? > > > > Yes, this is exactly my point. > > Imagine that a node already holds a lock and another node is waiting for > the lock. If all partition nodes leave the grid and the lock is re-created, > this second node will immediately acquire the lock and we will have two > lock owners. I think in this case this second node (blocked on lock()) > should get an exception saying that the lock was lost (which is, by the > way, the current behavior), and the first node should get an exception on > unlock. > Makes sense.
