On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Sergi Vladykin <sergi.vlady...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think updating an Atomic cache from within a transaction perfectly makes > sense. For example for some kind of operations logging and so forth. Still > I agree that this can be error prone and forbidden by default. I agree with > Yakov that by default we should throw an exception and have some kind of > flag (on cache or on TX?) to be able to explicitly enable this behavior. > Agree, this sounds like a good idea.
