+1

Sergi

2017-05-23 10:20 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko <
[email protected]>:

> +1
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Semyon Boikov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > This branch (https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-5267) adds a
> > > distributed and transactional Persistent Store to Apache Ignite
> project.
> > > The store seamlessly integrates with Apache Ignite 2.0 page memory
> > > architecture. One of the main advantages of the store is that Apache
> > Ignite
> > > becomes fully operational from disk (SSD or Flash) without any need to
> > > preload the data in memory. Plus, with full SQL support already
> available
> > > in Apache Ignite, this feature will allow Apache Ignite serve as a
> > > distributed SQL database, both in memory or on disk, while continuing
> to
> > > support all the existing functionality on the current API.
> > > More information here:
> > > - Persistent Store Overview: https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > confluence/display/IGNITE/Persistent+Store+Overview
> > > - Persistent Store Internal Design: https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > confluence/display/IGNITE/Persistent+Store+Internal+Design
> > > The Persistent Store was developed by GridGain outside of Apache
> > community
> > > because it was requested by one of GridGain’s customers. Presently,
> > > GridGain looks forward to donating the Persistent Store to ASF and
> given
> > > the size of the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP
> > clearance
> > > process.
> > > The SGA has been submitted and acknowledged by ASF Secretary. The IP
> > > clearance form can be found here: http://incubator.apache.org/
> > > ip-clearance/persistent-distributed-store-ignite.html
> > > This vote is to discover if the Apache Ignite PMC and community are in
> > > favour of accepting this contribution.
> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> > > [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Persistent Store into the project
> > > [ ] 0, no opinion
> > > [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Denis
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to