This is how I see API to create data structures in user-defined caches: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2058
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Ilya Lantukh <ilant...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > There are other problems with current data structures implementation, > which are related to new persistence mechanics. For example, take a look at > this ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5324 > I think the best approach is to store data structures not in special > system cache, but in user defined ones. All API methods to access data > structures will have cacheName parameter, and unique identifier will be a > pair (cacheName, dsName). In this case we won't need a single place to > store all data structure metadata. > What do you think? > > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Mikhail Cherkasov <mcherka...@gridgain.com > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:29 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Won't it be confusing from a user stand point to have multiple data >> > structures with the same name? >> > >> >> I won't change this, optionally I can allow to have the same name for >> different data structures' types, >> but it's better to keep single namespace for all data structures as it's >> implemented now. >> >> >> > Also, what is the performance impact of this >> > change? >> > >> >> I'm working on a benchmark. >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Mikhail. >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Ilya > -- Best regards, Ilya
