+1 for both suggestions but I’m not sure we can do the change till 3.0.

—
Denis

> On Aug 2, 2017, at 1:27 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 for readFromBackup=false as well :-) Another example of default value
> with subtle effects.
> 
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <
> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Vladimir,
>> 
>> Personally, I agree that we should put correctness over performance,
>> however (1) is not a correct statement for TRANSACTIONAL caches. A
>> transactional client always validates the result of an operation and throw
>> a correct exception if operation failed. (1) is true for ATOMIC caches,
>> though.
>> 
>> A user can get in trouble in this default for both TX and ATOMIC caches if
>> a put is performed from a backup node and readFromBackup is set to false.
>> In this case, the simple read-after-write scenario may fail. I would rather
>> set readFromBackup to false by default, however, this fixes neither the SQL
>> nor ATOMIC caches issues.
>> 
>> +1 for the change, and extend the warning for partitioned caches with
>> readFromBackup=true and PRIMARY_SYNC.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2017-08-02 10:58 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>:
>> 
>>> Igniters,
>>> 
>>> I want to re-iterate idea of changing default synchronization mode from
>>> PRIMARY_SYNC to FULL_SYNC.
>>> 
>>> Motivation:
>>> 1) If user set [cacheMode=PARTITIONED, backups=1] he still could loose
>> data
>>> silently. Because primary node could report success to the client and
>> then
>>> crash before data is propagated to backups.
>>> 2) If user set [cacheMode=REPLICATED] and use SQL, he will might get
>>> invalid results if cache is being updated concurrently - well known
>> issue.
>>> 
>>> The only advantage of PRIMARY_SYNC is slightly better performance, but we
>>> should prefer correctness over performance.
>>> 
>>> Proposed changes:
>>> 1) Make FULL_SYNC default;
>>> 2) Print a warning about possibly incorrect SQL results if REPLICATED
>> cache
>>> is started in PRIMARY_SYNC mode.
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>>> 
>>> Vladimir.
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to